![]() The competition law remedies that were adopted, following the finding of liability, seem, however, to constitute the main measure for the “success” of the case(s). The Microsoft cases in the United States and in Europe have been influential in determining the contours of the substantive liability standards for dominant firms in US antitrust law and in EC Competition law. The paper explains some basics of the web browser’s printing features, architecture of Mozilla Firefox and discussion on developed add-on which supports various print related tasks. We have analyzed printing related features of aforesaid popular web browsers and developed an Add-on which supports eco-friendly printing functionalities for Mozilla Firefox. These printer friendly functionalities are not available in Mozilla Firefox. Many times a user needs to print or save only core content of web page other than advertisement or unnecessary content available on the web page without changing in its original content or to save a modified web page in PDF file format. Each of these supports print related functionalities such as print, page setup and print preview. At present various desktop web browsers are available such as Netscape Navigator, Internet Explorer, Opera, Safari, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome etc. ![]() Web browser is a software application for retrieving, presenting and traversing information resources on the World Wide Web. We analyze and compare the different approaches. Thus, the EU imposed quite different remedies in the two cases: an unbundling remedy for the WMP but a close to a must-carry requirement for IE. The EU settled with Microsoft with Microsoft undertaking the obligation to ask (through compulsory Windows updates) consumers whose computers have Internet Explorer pre-installed to choose a browser from a menu of competing browsers. In its second investigation of Microsoft, the EU alleged illegal tying of Internet Explorer (IE) with Windows. Windows-N was a commercial failure, and there has been only limited cross-platform server entry. After finding Microsoft liable and imposing a large fine, the EU imposed as remedies the requirements on Microsoft (i) to sell a version of Windows without WMP (Windows-N) and (ii) to publish and license interoperability information. The first EU case alleged (i) that Microsoft illegally bundled the Windows Media Player (WMP) with Windows and (ii) that Microsoft did not provide adequate documentation that would allow full interoperability between Windows servers and non-Microsoft servers as well as between Windows clients and non-Microsoft servers. We discuss and compare the remedies in the two cases antitrust cases of the European Union (EU) against Microsoft.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |